Caregiver stress: a mobile program tested, with no demonstrated effectiveness

Offering exercises on a phone can make support easier to access, without guaranteeing a reduction in stress. A randomized pilot trial involving 30 millennial Latino family caregivers in the United States evaluated a program combining mindfulness and journaling. The study mainly provides information on feasibility: no effectiveness testing was conducted.

Illustration of a phone displaying a personal journal and a mindfulness exercise.
MindsetEditorial illustration, not study data.

An automated program over four weeks

Participants were assigned to either a culturally adapted mobile intervention or a waitlist group. For four weeks, the platform offered daily mindfulness exercises and journaling prompts. The control group received a written document covering mindfulness, journaling and support resources.

The researchers collected measurements at baseline, then at two, four and six weeks. They focused particularly on caregiver burden and perceived stress, as well as well-being and support received. This comparator therefore does not allow the program to be assessed against a complete absence of information.

Burden and stress move in different directions

In the intervention group, the median burden score fell from 20 before the intervention to 15 afterward. However, the median stress score increased from 19.50 to 21. In the control group, the medians for both measures remained unchanged.

These descriptive changes demonstrate neither a benefit for caregiver burden nor an increase in stress caused by the program. Without effectiveness testing, and with such a small sample, they do not establish whether the intervention performs better or worse than the written document.

Well-being, positive affect and informational support increased in both groups. These results therefore cannot be attributed specifically to the mobile platform.

Adherence remains the main challenge

Of the 30 participants recruited, 21 completed data collection at six weeks, a retention rate of 70%. The descriptive outcome analyses cover these participants, which limits their relevance if those who left the study had a different experience.

Journaling was preferred to mindfulness exercises, and adherence varied by activity. The authors therefore identify adjustments needed to the program’s content and implementation. That is the useful outcome of this pilot: identifying obstacles before attempting to establish effectiveness.

Limitations to keep in mind

Only the PubMed abstract was consulted, not the full text. The sample is small, the results are descriptive and no effectiveness testing was conducted. The study population does not represent all caregivers. Funding and conflicts of interest were not checked.

What we can take away

This pilot does not justify recommending this platform to reduce caregiver stress. It mainly shows that mobile support still needs to improve adherence and retention before its effectiveness can be evaluated.

Sources and provenance

Partager cet article

X f in

An error or a source to report? Contact the editorial team.