Alarm fatigue in intensive care: relaxation and nature sounds show a benefit on scores

In intensive care, repeated alarms can lead to desensitization to alerts. A randomized trial involving 96 nurses in Iran suggests that progressive muscle relaxation and listening to nature sounds reduce alarm fatigue. However, the abstract reviewed does not allow us to quantify the practical significance of the benefit or conclude that patient safety improves.

Monitoring devices and their alarm signals in an intensive care unit.
MindsetEditorial illustration, not study data.

Two interventions compared with a control group

The researchers recruited 96 nurses working in intensive care at three hospitals in southern Iran. They randomly assigned them to three groups of 32 people: progressive muscle relaxation, exposure to nature sounds, or a control group.

Progressive muscle relaxation involves tensing and then relaxing different muscle groups in sequence. However, the abstract does not specify the duration or frequency of the sessions, or the conditions under which participants listened to the sounds. It also does not describe what the control group received.

Alarm fatigue was assessed using a validated scale before the intervention, immediately afterward, and two months later. The trial is described as single-blind, but the abstract does not indicate who was unaware of group assignments.

Lower scores, but an unknown magnitude of benefit

Both interventions resulted in significantly lower alarm fatigue scores than in the control group. No statistically significant difference was observed between muscle relaxation and nature sounds. This does not, however, demonstrate that they are equivalent.

The abstract provides neither mean scores, absolute differences between groups, nor confidence intervals. It is therefore impossible to determine whether the improvement represents a meaningful change in healthcare workers’ daily practice. It also does not detail the results at each assessment point, which limits interpretation of whether the benefit was maintained at two months.

A finding that does not demonstrate a better response to alerts

The authors’ conclusion refers to improved professional performance and greater patient safety. Yet the abstract reports no measurements of alarm response times, care errors, or adverse events in patients. A lower fatigue score is not enough to establish these benefits.

These results therefore offer a possible way to support nurses exposed to alarms, not proof that these interventions address the problem of the alerts themselves. Whether the findings can be generalized to other departments or hospital systems also remains uncertain.

Limitations to keep in mind

Only the Europe PMC abstract was reviewed, not the full text. The magnitude of the effects, intervention procedures, what the control group received, and any adverse effects are not specified. Funding and conflicts of interest could not be verified.

What we can take away

Progressive muscle relaxation and nature sounds appear to reduce alarm fatigue scores in this trial. Their practical effect on vigilance and care safety remains to be demonstrated.

Sources and provenance

Partager cet article

X f in

An error or a source to report? Contact the editorial team.