Heat in schoolyards: shade and vegetation stand out in a review of 35 studies

How can schoolyards be made more bearable in the heat? A systematic review of 35 studies highlights vegetation and shade as the most effective strategies for improving outdoor thermal comfort. But the available abstract neither quantifies their effects nor establishes a measured benefit for health or learning.

Schoolyard with trees and shaded areas alongside spaces exposed to the sun.
Gadgets & TechEditorial illustration, not study data.

A review focused on school environments

The researchers brought together 35 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025 and identified through five databases. Their question concerns outdoor thermal comfort in schools, from kindergarten through secondary school.

The studies focus mainly on reducing summer heat stress, particularly in primary schools in Mediterranean and humid subtropical climates. This distribution limits the applicability of the conclusions to other climates and seasonal conditions.

Shade and vegetation stand out, but no quantified effects are available

According to the abstract, vegetation and shade consistently emerge as the most effective mitigation strategies across the climates studied. This places them among the priority options to consider when designing a schoolyard.

However, the abstract provides no quantified temperature reduction, overall estimate of improved comfort or detailed comparison between design options. It therefore cannot identify a universal solution or predict the outcome at a particular school.

Measuring comfort is not enough to demonstrate a health benefit

Most studies combine field measurements with numerical simulations, generally using objective thermal comfort indices. The review also notes the growing integration of subjective and behavioral dimensions, including behavioral adaptation.

These findings primarily concern the thermal environment. The abstract reports no measured effects on heat-related illnesses, attention or academic performance. The authors call for more integrated and participatory approaches, rather than a purely technical view of schoolyards.

Limitations to keep in mind

Only the PubMed abstract was consulted, not the full text. It does not detail study quality, sample sizes, durations, comparators or effect sizes. Funding and conflicts of interest were not checked.

What we can take away

Shade and vegetation are the options most strongly highlighted by this review for improving thermal comfort in schoolyards. Their potential value should not be turned into a quantified promise of better health or learning.

Sources and provenance

Partager cet article

X f in

An error or a source to report? Contact the editorial team.