Incurable gastroesophageal cancer: a strength training and protein program proves difficult to follow

Combining strength training and protein may seem sensible when facing cancer-related physical decline. But the program also needs to be manageable during treatment. In 20 patients with incurable gastroesophageal cancer, a randomized feasibility trial reports inadequate adherence, particularly to protein supplementation. It does not allow conclusions about the effectiveness of this approach.

Illustration of a strength training exercise and a protein supplement in the context of cancer care.
TrainingEditorial illustration, not study data.

A trial focused on feasibility during chemotherapy

Cancer cachexia is associated with reduced physical function, quality of life and survival. The researchers assessed whether patients about to start first-line chemotherapy for incurable gastroesophageal cancer could follow a program combining resistance training and protein supplementation.

The randomized, unblinded trial compared a group offered three training sessions per week and daily protein supplementation with a control group. Its primary objective was feasibility, assessed through recruitment, retention, adherence and adverse events. The available abstract does not specify the program’s duration or the amount of protein.

Staying in the study does not mean following the program

Of 106 potentially eligible patients, 20 were randomized, giving a recruitment rate of 19%. Of these, 18 completed the trial. This high retention contrasts with more limited adherence to the interventions.

Median adherence was 63% for strength training sessions and 39% for protein supplements. Only five participants in the intervention group, or 38%, met the minimum feasibility criteria for both components. The abstract details neither these thresholds nor the reasons for low adherence.

The authors conclude that this combination, in the form tested, was not feasible during first-line chemotherapy because of low recruitment and poor adherence to supplementation.

Neither demonstrated benefit nor proof of ineffectiveness

No between-group differences were detected in body composition, physical function, quality of life or treatment tolerance. With only 20 participants and limited adherence, this lack of difference does not demonstrate that strength training or protein is ineffective.

No serious adverse events related to the intervention were reported. However, this finding in a small sample is not enough to establish the program’s safety for all patients concerned.

The trial’s main contribution therefore concerns implementation: the program tested proved difficult to follow in this clinical setting. These findings cannot be generalized to healthy people, other cancers or other forms of support.

Limitations to keep in mind

Only the PubMed abstract was consulted, not the full text. The trial is small, unblinded and focused on feasibility. The abstract does not specify the duration, protein dose, details of the control group or reasons for low adherence. Funding and conflicts of interest could not be verified.

What we can take away

This trial highlights a feasibility problem, not a verdict on the effectiveness of strength training or protein against cancer cachexia.

Sources and provenance

Partager cet article

X f in

An error or a source to report? Contact the editorial team.